Interesting mix of history based theory and problem based international torts. It is a good introductory subject

- History-based and quite conceptually vague in regards to the law. It's a soft-core start to Torts for the term after, but no where near the depth and level of analysis you go into. - Lots of reading as usual and could get boring at times, but still need to take notes for the marks - the first few assignments were individualistic and fun. You could get creative with your writing a bit for some marks - worked hard and did well in first few assignments until the final. Regret to not have taken final more seriously and put in hard work, so overall only achieved 70. - work hard guys!

Sincerely I find anything related to law to be very simple, I did not need help of anyone to pass this subject. Overall this was an amazing subject that I passed seamlessly

The content is quite heavily centred around legal history and Aboriginal law, with quite slight focus on problem questions and how to apply laws. The textbook is nice though, with an additional use of two chapters for torts in PDF format at the end. The law lecturer who took my class was really amazing though, they taught with attention to detail and made it really enjoyable and engaging despite the content not being of the most interesting form

Starting off your law degree with this course doesn't leave a very good impression. The content is quite boring and very historical. Towards the end it gets a bit more interesting and feels more relevant. Whilst I wasn't really loving each class, I also wasn't dying and counting down the seconds, but this was thankfully only because of my law lecturer, who was pretty decent, led each class well and was engaging. I personally found it very difficult to do well in the course as instructions for assessments are quite vague, especially with the court report. Leaves you hoping that future law courses will be better...

This course is not the best. A lot of the content on the history of the legal profession doesn't feel the most relevant, but on the plus side does not all need to be known for the final exam. This course does get some kudos for having a fairly easy to prepare for exam, and for talking about lawyer's mental health within the first few weeks.

80% of this course is a waste of time , didnt sign up for 3 months of history , okay 1-2 weeks but literally every week up until the last couple is all historical nonsense. The course should be a FOCUSED skills course not just here and there

Not a great subject. Far too simplistic to be of any real value except to learn superficial basics.

As a transfer student I would have to say this is the most badly organised course I have ever done. The only reason I would have to say this has gone unnoticed is its full of fresh uni students who don't yet know better. I mean the exam doesn't even line up with your class work. The teaching from my experience is poor and not regulated. I feel the teachers have all banded together to take a mark whenever they can, rather than give one. All in all a very upsetting experience, it actually got to the point where I was angry, fed up and upset.

Starting off your law degree with this course doesn't leave a very good impression. The content is quite boring and very historical. Towards the end it gets a bit more interesting and feels more relevant. Whilst I wasn't really loving each class, I also wasn't dying and counting down the seconds, but this was thankfully only because of my law lecturer, who was pretty decent, led each class well and was engaging. I personally found it very difficult to do well in the course as instructions for assessments are quite vague, especially with the court report. Leaves you hoping that future law courses will be better...