The lectures cover some very interesting and relevant source material, and the assignments provide an opportunity for independent research and more complex historical and historiographical analysis. The reason for my low score is as follows: the tutorials are entirely student lead discussion, and the lecturer has very specific demands for their assignments and is very harsh in their marking. Assessment criteria is very very lengthy (multiple pages long) and could easily be simplified to avoid confusion. Great content and topic, but delivery needs some refinement.

Anonymous, Semester 2, 2020