I loved this unit. I was a bit nervous entering this unit as almost everyone I talked to had done PHAR1101 (unlike me). The content was interesting and easy to grasp (at least after reviewing a lecture). Important labs skills were taught, and the labs were a great way to make new friends :). The tests were very easy, and so was the end of sem exam. The hardest part of the unit was the research asisgnement! Finding relevant academic journals, no older than the 2000s was very difficult. From my experience, I kept finding review articles which were not allowed in this assignment (fair). Ricky was very organised and I’m glad he was my first PHAR UC. He was very passionate about his unit, and I’m fortunate he provided all the resources we needed to succeed (especially the discussion board!). This unit was a very easy HD for me, and very enjoyable too.

Agree with reviews below, ricky is super well organised, and ALWAYS reply to mails. Content was interesting and unit was well managed. Not too content heavy. My only complaint is the research which was worth 10% but took way too long and had dumb restrictions for no reason. Would reccomend the unit.

The unit is very well organised and Ricky is a very good unit coordinator. He pretty much responded to every discussion board post within a few hours. The lecture content is all pretty straight forward, but there is quite a bit to remember. The labs were all easy, as long as you are careful and also read the instructions prior to attending. The two lecture tests and final exam were also fairly easy, and studying well for the two lecture tests really pays off for the final exam. Although it wasn't marked harshly, the research assignment was the most difficult assignment in this unit BY FAR. It is tricky because there are several restrictions placed on what kind of source you are allowed to use, and there's not really any sources out there that answers the assignment directly. You had to piece together information from various sources to construct a theory/argument on the question provided, so its best to start early on the assignment.

This unit is honestly one of the easier biomed units. There are only 2 lectures a week, most lectures are 17-19 slides long. The longest one was probably around 25 slides. The labs get a bit repetitive but that's why they're fun and easy. Ricky is a really good unit coordinator and lecturer. He is very approachable, flexible, and understands the student perspective well in terms of condensing information and cutting out excess information to make studying easier. This unit is heavily memory based, so you need a good notes system. Exam questions were very fair, no surprises and you would've seen similar questions throughout semester. There are two lecture assessments, but they are both quite easy. There is one research assignment which for us was only worth 10%. The assignment is easy to do well in as long as your reasoning is backed by references. The assignment questions are broad and give room for multiple correct answers, so its easy to do well in them. Very well organised unit - personally I found this unit better than ANHB1101.

To be honest, this unit is not THAT content heavy as everyone is saying. In fact lectures on average were 19 slides long and the shortest lecture was only 10 slides long. Only 2 lectures a week as well. The unit coordinator probably listened to all the complaints about being content heavy but in general it wasn't that content heavy. Also questions are recycled including from practice questions which makes tests so much easier. He even recycles questions in the exam and I would say up to 50% of the multiple choice questions and probably 20% of short answer questions were recycled from the in-sem tests and practice questions. Basically this unit was pretty easy to do well in. I did it as an elective and really enjoyed it and it helped me in my other units. The only thing I hated was the 15% research assignment - kinda useless if you ask me and quite laborious.

Had to do this unit for my major. Content heavy. Had an exam. Had a major assignment. Had labs- which were better than PHAR2220 labs. Wouldn't recommend as an elective but useful if you have an interest in pharmacology.

Absolutely loved this unit. However, I did not particularly like some of the pre exam assessments. For instance, the research based assignment. It was very vague and quite a bit to do for a second year unit. The two tests are very easy. The lab skills and lab reports are a bit weird so make sure you ask Ricky questions. The exam was super easy. It is highly memory based though. Basically Pharmacology. For ex. A question required you to know the structural difference between diclofenac and lumiracoxib. So you need to pay attention. Ask Ricky questions if you don't understand anything. Otherwise, it was a pretty enjoyable and informative unit and I loved it. Thankfully got a high HD.

Weird unit. The exam is worth 60% and the 2 tests are only worth 5% each. Compared to other majors the content is actually quite thorough and relevant to future material in postgrad and is very interesting. Phil is a great lecturer and presents it all in a way that makes you look forward to writing notes, but he does take his time explaining things so it might be a trek if you're not that interested in pharmacology. This unit could easily be restructured and the assessments should simply be scrapped and redone. The labs aren't directly assessed; you submit lab reports 2 weeks later that are mostly focused on research rather than the lab material itself, and they are marked super harshly! You aren't given much warning on this and there's not much guidance on what you're meant to do. Be prepared to be shocked by your mark if you format your references wrong. The research assignment has the potential to be an interesting topic but is far too broad and once again not much guidance is given. Tests and the exam are exclusively based on rote learning. It might sound wanky to say but I wish the short answer questions actually tested our understanding rather than regurgitate drug names and "types of hepatotoxicants". I did well in the unit but it didn't feel very thorough or satisfying. My tip is to remember everything when they give a numbered list and ALL drugs they give. I was very frustrated when they asked for drug names that weren't highlighted in the lectures.

Was happy that I ended up with a 91. I agree that this unit is very content heavy as a lot of memorisation is required. (Eg: Different types of antibacterial drugs, their mechanism, possible side effects, mechanism of side effects, etc) However, I find lecture13-24 really interesting, it's about toxicology and chemotherapy-antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal drugs. Lecture 1-12 is about pharmacokineticsc(absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion) and pharmacodynamics(receptors). I find them harder as they are more theoretical. The lab reports and research assignment took me a lot of time. Lab reports are doable as long as you address the question guidelines and relate/interpret your references with the questions. The research assignment is harder because we need to pick the drugs and topics to discuss by ourselves (within certain guidelines). I wouldn't recommend it as an elective but I think hard work pays off for this unit. The unit coordinator is nice and responsive to emails. The lecturers are great too, especially Phil in lecture13-24.

Despite having only 2 hours of lectures a week this unit is very content heavy. However the primary lecturer, Phil, does a great job explaining it all and is possibly one of the best lecturers at UWA. The content is organised extremely well. Both of the labs require a proper scientific report with research, which can feel like quite a lot of work for only 5% of the total grade. Other assessments include: a computer lab, where you use a simple program and answer questions, 2 25 minute tests which you do on a computer, a "lab skills test" where you do some dilutions and calculations. The final exam is heavy on short answer and the exam preparation materials don't fully prepare you for them, so make sure to be able to explain the topics in depth. I wouldn't recommend the unit to anyone outside the major unless you have a strong work ethic or passion for pharmacology. ... Also some good memes... K E V I N