Foundations of Law
70102 is rated by StudentVIP members:
TextbooksSell your textbook for 70102
Robert Allan Hughes, Geoffrey W. G. Leane, Andrew Clarke
For sale by David for $59
Michelle Sanson, Thalia Anthony
For sale by Antonia for $90
For sale by Kirra for $45
For sale by Suzie for $45
For sale by Victoria for $40
For sale by Taylor for $30
For sale by Claudia for $20
For sale by Lisa for $20
For sale by Akos for $15
Ainslie Lamb, John Littrich, Karina Murray
For sale by Akos for $40
NotesView all 70102 notes
Extremely detailed and complete result of doing all the readings going to all the seminars for FOL....
81 pages, 32621 words
These are my comprehensive summaries that helped me get FIRST PLACE IN THIS SUBJECT in Semester 2, 2...
92 pages, 39020 words
Notes for super cheap! Take a look at sample! Distinction quality
104 pages, 43303 words
I scored a HD in 70102 - Foundations of Law with these notes. They are fully annotated with example...
43 pages, 18884 words
These extensive notes include information taken from seminars, various textbooks, prescribed reading...
73 pages, 29950 words
'to the point' notes made from the textbook + tutorial information covering all topics. Extremely he...
28 pages, 14874 words
I have summarised all the content for subject 70102 into notes. It contains all subject materials fr...
52 pages, 20553 words
I scored a distinction in the final exam of this subject with these notes. These notes are a bri...
35 pages, 35 words
These are my Foundation of Law notes. They are complete & thorough. Very useful for the exam.
64 pages, 24517 words
Just look at these notes while you are in your exam and you will get a pass. WARNING: Only Semi...
36 pages, 14322 words
TutorsBecome a tutor for 70102
$60 per hour
My notes are from the most RECENT session in 2020 (with the online exams) so you will know EXACTLY w...
$100 per hour
An experienced tutor of 10+ years and lawyer working for the Australian Government, achieved marks o...
$65 per hour
The marks received for the offered subjects are as follows: - Evidence - 82 (Distinction) - Eq...
$85 per hour
Former lecturer in law at UTS in Foundations of Law, Criminal Law and Procedure and Ethics, Law and...
It should be a bit better as it is a first subject of law in the commencement of getting a law degree. maybe make it a bit more interesting
Anonymous, Autumn session, 2017
Content was pretty mundane, but was a good intro to whats to come. No exam made it even better
Anonymous, Autumn session, 2017
This is basically a more intense version of HSC Legal Studies. For those who have completed that in their HSC, this subject may seem repetitive in some topics. However, it does give a really good smack around the head to cocky students too. Given you have a good teacher, this subject will re-teach you how to read and write.
Anonymous, Autumn session, 2017
The fact that Foundations of Law is your first law subject is heartbreaking. Although there are some interesting bits, overall, this subject is neither fun nor easy. Foundations is seminar based. You need to do a significant amount of readings before class and discuss a handful of questions during class time. While this doesn't sound too bad, the planning for most classes is unprofessional. There are usually three to four completely unrelated topics discussed in each class and there is very little that may come out of the discussions anyways other than the few remarks made by the seminar leader. Best thing is to just write notes and not show up in class... except that... oh wait... you get marked on your participation. There are classes solely dedicated to discussing court cases. These are the interesting bits and they could be your only source of motivation for the term. Understandably, Foundations tries to teach you a bit of everything: the history of law from 1066 until 1778, 1778 to 1901 and 1901 to today; national and international legal bodies; study of the rule of law in different contexts and different views on law. While this is a good approach, it is problematic when it comes to assessment. It is very likely that the student will not get tested on a significant amount of content at all. Personally, I felt unfulfilled as a Foundations student and I felt that a lot of my time in this class was wasted. Foundations is nevertheless your first core subject and you need to pass in order to progress through your degree, so here go my tips: The most important thing that you must learn is the skills: reading, understanding and navigating legislation and cases. There are several websites that will be your legal bible for pretty much your whole study life and potentially career such as the infamous AustLII, Westlaw and LexisNexis. Learn how to use them. The final exam is open book. WRITE UP YOUR NOTES FOR EVERY SESSION. Your notes are ideally around 15% the size of the readings and in your exam, you are ideally going to use less than 50% of your notes. It will give you a huge advantage in terms of time and focus when you are in the exam room. These notes may be in the form of dot points or in case of court cases, in the form of case notes or in any other form that suits you but you NEED to have them. Participate in class discussions. In terms of knowledge, you will achieve a bit. In terms of your final mark, it decides 15% of it. The final exam is generally one problem question (40 mins) and one essay OR short answers (40 mins). Arguably the hardest part of the subject. While you cannot predict your performance in the exam, you have complete control over your assignments which, including your participation mark, decide 60% of your final mark.
Anonymous, Semester 1, 2015
I competed Foundations of Law in its commencing semester and I would like to believe that the blandness of the subject and the incredibly harsh marking is a disadvantage that has improved since then. The first assignment we received was a thirty word thesis, which was incredibly tedious, and it had a weighting of five percent. I believe the average was two, and by default you received one for handing it in. I believe they have since abolished this assignment from the course. The course content is generally quite dry and blunt and it scared me for what was to come in future law subjects. I'm glad I stuck through, however, because this introductory subject is perhaps the most uninteresting of all law subjects. It's basically a history course and if you did legal studies in year twelve, the parallels are hard to ignore. Keep up with your weekly readings. Keep proofreading your assignments and showing them to your teacher. The exam is perhaps the most difficult part of the course, so enter the exam with as many marks as possible to leverage yourself.The first part of the exam is quite easy - responding to a judgement in an IRAC manner - you will get the case beforehand and you will have a trial run with another case in class, so preparing for this shouldn't be overtly difficult. The second aspect, being an essay, is the markedly different and far more difficult component. You must include five thematically connected readings from the readings book in the essay, and come up with a reasonable thesis in response to the question, upon which you must substantiate with consistent referencing from the reading. Given only two hours to complete both parts of the exam means that you must know the readings extremely well to manage the time hurdle.