NEUR30003
Principles of Neuroscience
NEUR30003 is rated by StudentVIP members:
Textbooks
We don't have any textbooks for this subject yet.
Why don't you be the first?
Sell your textbook for NEUR30003Notes
View all NEUR30003 notes💥 Neuroscience - H1 Summary Notes - 2025 syllabus!!!
Summary Notes for NEUR30002 (2025 syllabus)!!!🔥 - Cover all topics in the new syllabus! (table o...
135 pages, 35393 words
Top Scoring NEUR30003 Course Summary: Updated for 2025 Syllabus
Top Scoring NEUR30003 Course Summary: Updated for 2025 Syllabus Smash NEUR30003 this semester wit...
95 pages, 41080 words
Principles of Neuroscience H1 notes - all lectures
Including extra information incorporated from the textbook, and important points highlighted during...
124 pages, 34563 words
Neuroscience Comprehensive Notes + Lectures Notes (H1-99%)
Well detailed comprehensive notes, guaranteed to score. Able to cope with this notes without attendi...
82 pages, 59922 words
H1 (94) Principles of Neuro (NEUR30003) Notes
These notes cover NEUR30003 lectures in great detail! I made sure to do my own research & check with...
58 pages, 25094 words
Principles of Neuroscience (H1, 83) --Comprehensive Subject Notes
A complete set of notes for Principles of Neuro covering all area of studies that you would ever nee...
119 pages, 11963 words
2020 S1 NEUR30003 Notes
This is note is written throughout the semester, and covers ALL the details you need to know on this...
220 pages, 72914 words
Comprehensive H1 Principles of Neuroscience Notes
Full notes from weeks 1 to 12 covering basics of neuroscience, developmental processes, sensory and...
45 pages, 20947 words
Principles of Neuroscience (NEUR30003) summary notes of lectures for revision before exams- H1 (91)
Inspired by the Cornell Note Taking System, fully tabulated summary notes with information categoris...
27 pages, 11305 words
NEUR30003 Lecture Notes
Very detailed notes on every lecture taught. All important diagrams and charts explained clearly alo...
146 pages, 28509 words
Tutors
Become a tutor for NEUR30003David
$130 per hour
𝐆𝐀𝐌𝐒𝐀𝐓 ☑︎ 1st attempt ☑︎ 𝟵𝟵𝘁𝗵 percentile overall ☑︎ 𝟵𝟵.𝟵𝘁𝗵 percentile in S3 ☑︎ 𝗛𝟭 in al...
Dave
$69 per hour
First session money-back guarantee. Highest Score in Developmental Psychology + Dean's Honours'...
Billie
$25 per hour
Awesome tutor || Homework helper || Cramming expert || PhD scholarship holder ** Learning is a...
Andy
$90 per hour
🌏 Psychology, Neuroscience || 95.75 WAM || Dean's List 2018-2021 || Highest WAM in Honours 2021 ||...
Sophie
$90 per hour
***GAMSAT(99th percentile), MMI and Unimelb subjects(H1)*** Hello! My name is Sophie. I'm currentl...
Christine
$90 per hour
I personally achieved high 80s and 90s for all of the subjects I tutor. I graduated high school as t...
Zee
$70 per hour
Psychology Honours | 90 WAM | Online or On-Campus Hi, I'm Z! I'm currently in my Honours year in...
Reviews
a lot of the people who give this subject a positive rating mention how interesting the content is. sure. the content is interesting. but it is delivered VERY badly. lectures have no learning outcomes, and they feel more like the lecturer's stories than actual content.no practice questions. no feedback. no monitoring of ed discussion. i kid you not the staff have sent ZERO messages there. there are posts complaining about the subject with 150 likes on ed discussion. i dont care how interesting the content is. this subject made so many people, including myself, doubt our entire undergrad career. i cannot warn people enough to avoid this subject (and the neuro major in general. neurophysiology is just as bad). pls pls avoid
Anonymous, Semester 1, 2026
Easily the worst subject I have ever done. There are no learning outcomes for about 80% of lectures. The content itself is interesting, but that does not make up for how terribly the subject was run. Staff did not monitor the discussion board at all, which made communication hard. There is no point in having a discussion board if staff are not willing to utilise it. On top of that, the main lecturer (Peter) rambles on in his lectures which adds to the difficulty of figuring out what to know when we already did not get learning outcomes. The MST was very difficult, and for practice MST questions, we were not given answers. In fact, the staff told us to use ChatGPT to figure out the answers. Do not take this subject unless you want to major in neuroscience, it will genuinely make you reconsider your entire degree and life choices!
Anonymous, Semester 1, 2026
I feel like its easy to hate the subject at first. At least compared to my other biomed/science subjects, this subject can be quite overwhelming and especially if you lose track midway and don't revise frequently. I think you shouldn't be fooled by the only-MCQ format because it really is NOT that easy, you actually need to put in effort into revising for this subject because they make the MST especially hard (to combat AI usage, etc.). The exam was not too bad (a lot easier than the MST) but there were some iffy questions. Having said that, this subject is genuinely so interesting and you appreciate the content you've learnt after its done. As I said this subject is overwhelming, but its because neuroscience is quite a broad field and you get a lot of exposure to MANY different aspects of neuroscience. Hence, I think you should only take this subject if you're up for learning a wide range of topics and you can stay organised with the mountains of content you'll be exposed to. I reckon a good thing to do for this subject is make practice questions for yourself and try to pick out the high-yield concepts/ideas that Peter or other lecturers discuss. They do test some specific details at times but its not the case for all MCQs. (Also pay close attention to weekly questions available on LMS!!)
Anonymous, Semester 1, 2026
I truly believe that all the 1 star reviews are overreacting. this subject is the most interesting and intellectually stimulating subject i have taken in my degree so far. it is true, as you may have read below, that it has some admin issues like ed discussion not being monitored, and its sometimes tricky to synthesise exactly whats important from the slides because there are no learning objectives. thus, to do well in this subject you need to actually get involved and thinking about the content and ACTUALLY watch the lectures. this is NOT the subject for you if you just want to cram in the last 2 days before an exam by chucking the slides into chatgpt. people are complaining about the lectures, thats simply because instead of there being a lump of text on the slide, peter will actually verbally explain a diagram. apparently everyone has become unable to think. i could spend all day here contradicting all the negative comments. i really enjoyed this subject and found myself (for the first time ever) actually telling my friends and family in my own time about what we've been learning about. if not for the terrible admin i would give this subject 5 stars! this is probably the most important review for you to read if you are considering taking the subject! please try to be realistic and ignore any overly negative comments (someone said the subject is awful and they are disgusted... hahaha pls)
Anonymous, Semester 1, 2026
Peter is so cute 🥺 His lectures made me feel Fuzzy inside Btw I am not trolling
Anonymous, Semester 1, 2026
Highly intellectually stimulating topics. Lots of content, but if you keep up with the lectures, a H1 is highly achievable. Definitely one of the best subjects I've took so far. The coordinator, Peter, is highly engaging and knowledgable too
Anonymous, Semester 2, 2026
I know there's a lot of hate for this subject, but I personally think it was one of the more interesting ones during my study. I think majority of the criticism is in regards to the delivery of the subject--not much resources, general clarification & support in ways that many students are used to, in the form of Ed Discussion tutorials etc. Don't think the hate train is quite justified: This subject just trains you to learn differently by forcing you to synthesise relevant information from the lectures in your own way. I really enjoyed the content overall and while it was content-heavy, the final exam was definitely more lenient.
Anonymous, Semester 1, 2026
RUN DONT WALK away from this subject!!!!!!!!
Anonymous, Semester 1, 2026
I really disagree with the many 1 star reviews. This subject was difficult but super interesting. There was a lot of nuanced psychological stuff that i personally thought was really cool. Peter's lecture slides were frustrating but if you write down what he says for notes rather than just focusing on the slides then you'll be fine. A lot of people complained about the subject in the Ed Discussion but I think it was quite clear that it wasn't being monitored by staff (which is common). Emailing these questions to Peter (as he offered) or talking to him after a lecture would have been the smarter option. I didn't do amazingly on the MST but that's on me for not studying - and helpful feedback was given for the questions which isn't usually given. If you're someone that likes to learn interesting things further than just how synapses work and what the serotonin is, you will like this subject - its one of the most intellectually stimulating ones I've ever taken.
Anonymous, Semester 1, 2026
would give 0 stars if i could. fully agreed with all the 1 star comments below. so disappointed. Coordinators don't care about students feedback and 0 support.