Echoing the previous review, it does draw heavily from equity and property law. You really need to recap remedies/tracing/fiduciary duties [profits/conflict rule] before you start the unit. The great thing about the unit is that the topics are very clear and build on each other. However, the lecturers often had unnecessary information, or horribly formatted slides, which would overcomplicate things. It is one of those units where it doesn't fully click/come together until you go through all 12 weeks. It is similar to admin law structurally - the majority of the content focuses on breaches of trustee duties (similar to admin law spending the majority of time on grounds of review), so you may find similarities between how you structure your notes. One major downside to the unit was the lack of feedback. We were promised individual and general feedback for our written assessment. However, only some students got written feedback. The CE then decided to change the assignment instructions after the marks were released (and after receiving complaints) to say that only general feedback would be given. The CE also emailed saying we would get an HD sample answer, which we never got. This was quite disappointing. The content is interesting, but some (not all) of the teaching staff were not acting up to standard.

This unit really drew from previous subjects (equity, contracts, even property law) in a way that was manageable and really let me see how law units interact. Clear topics and readings - can be challenging if you fall behind, but really interesting if you're up to date!